Mastery Education

• Competencies Overview | Accessible Version
• Competency Set & Skills Progression

• Idaho Competencies Map
• Knowledge of Core Subjects
• Critical Thinking and Creative Problem Solving
• Oral and Written Communication
• Teamwork and Collaboration
• Digital Literacy
• Leadership
• Professionalism and Work Ethic
• Career Exploration and Development
• Citizenship and Civic Responsibility
• Financial Literacy
• Full Set of Competencies (Printable)

• Level Set Map
• Levels 1-3 Set
• Levels 2-4 Set
• Levels 3-5 Set
• Levels 4-6 Set

Successful change management will incorporate the following key ideas:

Stakeholder Participation

All stakeholders must work together to remove systemic barriers in order to create a student-centered Mastery Learning system. That means members of the school community will have different roles throughout the process, serving at different points as participants, decision-makers, and advocates.

Teacher Support

Supporting teachers with resources and time devoted to capacity building throughout the process drives the change. Shifts in teacher practice with respect to curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy are the most powerful levers of impact on student outcomes. Well-designed systems are no replacement for highly skilled people.

Community Involvement

Local conditions inform the specific sequence of actions a system undertakes, supported by research, proven practice, and the experience of systems that have done the work. There is no one single pathway to a sustainable, scalable Mastery Learning system because the needs and values of the communities they serve form the foundation for any well-designed system.

Student-centered

Mastery Learning systems ensure that all students are given what they need to be successful, including support, time, and multiple opportunities to practice and demonstrate learning. Mastery Learning systems are inclusive, nurturing, and culturally sustaining environments where failure is not an option.

Aligned to the four components of the framework, this document is a quick summary of the shifts associated with each component of the Idaho Mastery-Based Education Framework. What are priorities for your team? Eventually, each shift will have professional development associated with it for teachers and administrators to access for free.

• Key Shifts of Mastery-Based Learning from the Staging Guide and Framework

There are several statutes and places in IDAPA code the support or relate to mastery. How will your system address them? Support and guidance documents found here should help!

Origin Story: Idaho Statute 33-1632

The statute that started Mastery-Based Education in Idaho.

HB 172 Learning Outside of the Traditional Classroom:

Students attending public schools in Idaho shall be eligible (to receive credit) for extended learning opportunities outside of the traditional classroom.

Response and support under development

Awarding Credit for demonstration of mastery (IDAPA Code 08.02.03 105.01.b)

Mastery: student may also achieve credit by demonstrating mastery of a subject’s content standards as defined and approved by the local school district or LEA. How will your district define mastery and award credit?

• Determining Mastery (Summary)
• Determining Mastery (Full Guide)

Does your LEA include demonstration of mastery in its credit recovery system or alternate mechanism to determine grade level promotion? Guidance documents are currently under development.

Patterns of Instructional Organization (IDAPA 08.02.03 103.01)

Courses must have properly endorsed and certificated instructors, be associated with an accurate assignment code, and have a start and end date, but course descriptions, titles and how the time is organized, is up to local control.

The transparency in a mastery-based learning system encourages students to play a greater role, and invest more, in their educational success. With the support of teachers, students take productive risks to learn and demonstrate the competencies, as the focus shifts to learning rather than earning a grade. They make important decisions about their learning pathways, providing insight on projects, activities, and the individual support needed to reach their potential. Self-reflection and self-assessment, along with goal setting and progress monitoring, become regular habits. Through meaningful collaboration and routine teacher and peer feedback, learners support one another in their academic growth.

Growth Mindset: Shifting from Fixed Intelligence to Growth Mindset

Learners’ beliefs about their intelligence and ability matter greatly. They are predictive of student behavior in school, and they greatly influence engagement and motivation.

• System Indicators: Learners have a mastery orientation, regularly reflecting on their learning, celebrating their own growth and the growth of others, and demonstrating positive persistence.
• Student Learning Indicators: Norms, routines, rituals, and practices create community, foster a strong sense of connectedness, and help learners develop important social and emotional skills and dispositions.

Relationships: Shifting from Disconnected from Adults and Community to Caring Relationships that Sustain and Support

The quality of relationships between adults and learners has a profound impact on student achievement. Knowing the learners in our classrooms is the foundation of successful personalized learning.

• System Indicators: Adults build deep, caring relationships with students to support their academic and socio-emotional development, advocate for their well-being, and jointly monitor their academic progress as they advance through the learning system.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners feel that they have ongoing opportunities to build strong relationships with adults, who remain formally engaged in their learning, and with peers, who they see as collaborators for learning and co-creators of knowledge.

Teacher Collaboration: Shifting from Silos and Inequities to Collaboration and Calibration

When schools and systems break down silos around professional practice and create common competencies, assessments, and expectations that promote mastery, learners’ benefit.

• System Indicators: Teachers engage in collegial practice to support student learning, such as collaboratively analyzing student work, planning responsive instruction, and coaching or mentoring one another.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners have adult role models for setting goals, ongoing learning, and collaboration with peers; they tangibly benefit from teachers’ collegial efforts to improve learning experience and outcomes.

Community Connection: Shifting from Learning Restricted to School Hours and Walls to Learning Extends Beyond School Hours and Walls

Deep connections between school and community support personalization and promote equity. Mastery Learning systems support authentic, real-world learning because the priority is the demonstration of competency, not where the learning took place.

• System Indicators: Schools are meaningfully connected to the broader community, providing expanded learning opportunities for students to learn and apply skills, explore interests, and engage in relationship-building beyond the classroom.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners can articulate opportunities for learning experiences that meaningfully connect formal schooling to the local or global community and that are valued by the learning system. Learners feel safe and connected in the learning community, and can describe ways in which their culture and the culture of their communities are valued in the learning environment.

Graduate Profile: Shifting from Inequitable, Variable Student Outcome to Shared, Transparent Values and Competencies

The graduate profile articulates a vision for learners that goes beyond K-12 academic excellence. It is defined by competencies that are explicit and measurable with learning objectives that describe specific and observable skills, knowledge, and behaviors.

• System Indicators: A set of high-quality academic and efficacy competencies articulate a distilled, equity-driven, unifying school/institutional vision for learner outcomes in a way that is transparent and accessible to all stakeholders.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners know what they are learning, why they are learning it, and how it promotes the ultimate goal of their education.

Mastery Learning provides a foundation for personalized learning through flexible pacing and delivery of common expectations and performance-based assessments. Students receive timely, differentiated supports based on individual academic strengths and needs, and the opportunity to share their understanding in multiple ways. Learning experiences offer opportunities to collaborate in meaningful ways by leveraging student interests and connections to their community. Personalized learning, driven by meaningful interactions with teachers and peers, results in higher levels of student engagement and agency.

Inquiry-Based Learning Experiences: Shifting from Delivery of Knowledge to Authentic Academic Experiences

Inquiry is at the heart of powerful academic endeavors. Wondering about something, researching it, developing a point of view, making a case: this is what academic and professional work is all about. Inquiry prioritizes student questions and ideas, which supports their sense of efficacy, their capacity, and their understanding of themselves as agents of their own learning.

• System Indicators: Inquiry-based learning experiences, built with thoughtfully chosen resources and driven by student inquiry, create personal pathways toward competency.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners are regularly engaged in inquiry, posing questions, investigating answers and solutions, and sharing their results, while simultaneously and continuously synthesizing and reflecting to build schema.

Explicit Skill and Strategy Instruction: Shifting from Focus on Knowledge Transfer to Focus on Transferable Skills and Strategies

Explicit skill and strategy instruction, often in the form of modeling and think-alouds, ensures that students learn how to apply skills and strategies to content and to the processes of learning themselves. Cognitive apprenticeship and gradual release of responsibility prepare students to undertake rigorous tasks and to take ownership of their own learning.

• System Indicators: Teachers provide students explicit skill and strategy instruction through metacognitive modeling, with ongoing opportunities to practice and apply skills and strategies.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners have regular and varied opportunities to develop key cognitive and metacognitive skills and strategies, with sufficient time to practice and apply new skills and strategies in collaborative and independent settings; they can describe the connection to the specific skills or strategies they are developing.

Expanded Discussion: Shifting from Teacher Directed Instruction to Student-led Academic Discourse

Expanded discussion creates opportunities for students to listen carefully to others’ thinking and to provide responses showing critical engagement with the task. By removing the written word as a potential barrier for meaning-making and synthesizing new learning, student discourse opens the door to deeper student understanding and provides teachers with data to diagnose and respond to student needs in real time.

• System Indicators: Teachers create opportunities for students to listen and respond to others’ thinking, demonstrating critical engagement with the task and participating in rich academic discourse.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners listen carefully to others’ thinking and provide responses showing critical engagement with the task, opening the door to collaborative meaning-making and deeper understanding.

Formative Assessment: Shifting from Assessment OF Learning to Assessment FOR Learning

Formative assessments keep teacher and student focused on intended outcomes, common understanding of the target, the student’s progress, and the next steps for learning. Continuous monitoring of learning allows the student and teacher to adjust course and try alternate approaches in real time.

• System Indicators: Teachers and students use formative assessment to identify and respond to learner needs in real time.
• Student Learning Indicators: Students access their learning data in real time, and can discuss, reflect, and evaluate their work and progress relative to their goals; they benefit from timely, responsive attention to their needs.

Flexible Environments and Grouping: Shifting from Adult-centric and Static to Responsive and Agile

Flexible learning environments and responsive pedagogical practices are structured to support learning opportunities that optimize engagement, agency, growth, and a sense of community. Each facet of the learning experience is matched to the needs of learners.

• System Indicators: Learning spaces and grouping strategies are flexible, enabling individualized, timely supports based on specific targets and observed needs, while also allowing students to collaborate and engage purposefully with one another independently.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners participate in an array of learning activities and flexible groupings based on specific goals, needs, and interests.

The Idaho College and Career Readiness Competencies adopted by the State Board of Education provide the foundation for the Idaho-Mastery Based Education Framework. Competencies represent the knowledge, skills, and personal attributes that lead to success. Mastery learning environments focus on competencies through rigorous real-world applications that prepare students for diverse postsecondary pathways. Competencies make learning equitable and transparent through explicit, measurable, and transferable learning objectives.

Content and Competency Aligned: Shifting from Content Focused to Content to Competency Aligned

Assessment for learning allows educators to respond to student needs to ensure that all students achieve and demonstrate the content and skill objectives. Assessment also forms the foundation for the clear, actionable feedback that is essential to building students’ capacity to take ownership of their learning. This agency-building approach is responsive to both the academic and cultural needs of students, who develop a strong sense of their growth over time and see themselves reflected in the curriculum.

• System Indicators: Curriculum and assessment affirm and build upon learners’ interests, cultural backgrounds, and identities, while actively creating well-scaffolded, autonomy-enhancing opportunities to build and demonstrate competence.
• Student Learning Indicators: Curriculum and assessment affirm and build upon learners’ interests, cultural backgrounds, and identities, while actively creating well-scaffolded, autonomy-enhancing opportunities to build and demonstrate competence.

Student-Centered Learning Cycle: Shifting from Opaque Learning Processes to Transparent Student-Centered Learning

Learning experiences are informed by an inquiry-driven Learning Cycle grounded in the learning sciences and in child and youth development research. The Learning Cycle serves as a framework for the design of experiences that move students through a transparent learning process. In each stage of the cycle, expanded student choice and a metacognitive approach to learning nurture student agency.

• System Indicators: The Learning Cycle drives learning experiences, engaging learners in meaning-making, investigation, creation, communication, synthesis, and reflection.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners can describe the underlying structure and processes that support their learning, including both cognitive and metacognitive skills and strategies.

Personalized Pathways: Shifting from One-size-fits-all Progression to Student-directed and Monitored Learning

When schools and systems break down silos around professional practice and create common competencies, assessments, and expectations that promote mastery, learners’ benefit.

• System Indicators: Lessons, units, courses, and classes are flexible, arranged to allow multiple learning pathways and responsiveness to student needs.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners have both opportunity and capacity to select from a range of developmentally appropriate, meaningful choices within and among culturally responsive units of study; choices are designed to increase relevance, foster self-regulatory capabilities, and support interest-based learning.

System of Assessments: Shifting from Point-in-time Testing and Advancement to Multiple Opportunities to Demonstrate Learning

Assessments are designed to create powerful learning experiences for students and to provide all stakeholders with the data they need to draw accurate inferences about student achievement. Assessments are built on the belief that learners develop skills over time and competence emerges gradually, not spontaneously. The mastery-based design of the tasks hinges on bringing the feedback cycle into the classroom, presenting learners with multiple opportunities for practice, allowing them to revise work as their skills develop, and providing frequent actionable feedback.

• System Indicators: A clearly articulated set of performance assessments allows students to develop and to demonstrate each competency at higher levels of sophistication as they progress toward graduation.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners can articulate the connections between the competencies or skills they are developing, the content they are learning, performance-based assessments they are working on, and how each of these relates to their learning goals and personalized pathway.

Successful change management will incorporate the following key ideas:

Drivers of Policies and Systems: Shifting from a Focus on Adult Needs to A Common Mission and Vision for Student Competence

Community values drive the design of policies and systems to support a culture of mastery. Policies and systems are the bridge between the statutes and the daily practices in the school. They have to be grounded in the same values that the community wants to manifest in the classroom.

• System Indicators: Policies and systems are grounded in the values essential to Mastery Learning: equity, growth, responsiveness, flexibility, and transparency.
• Student Learning Indicators: Students learn in an environment that is equitable, growth-oriented, responsive, flexible, and transparent.

Flexible Organization of Time: Shifting from a Focus on Adult Needs to Flexible Use of Time

Time is organized to responsively meet the needs of educators and learners. Flexible use of time supports personalized pathways and pacing, and ensures equitable opportunities to demonstrate mastery.

• System Indicators: Flexible, responsive scheduling enables personalized student pacing for developing and demonstrating competence.
• Student Learning Indicators: Learners build and demonstrate their growing competence at the time and the pace appropriate to their needs.

Shifting from Organized to Meet Adult Needs to Differentiated Adult Roles

Differentiated adult roles responsively meet the needs of learners and leverage professionals’ strengths to support personalized pathways and pacing, and ensure equitable opportunities to demonstrate mastery.

• System Indicators: Flexible, differentiated roles enable adults to leverage their strengths to provide responsive supports to ensure all learners develop competence.
• Student Learning Indicators: Students access learning partners, resources, tools, and supports they need when they need them.

Grading, Advancement and Crediting: Shifting from Gateways and Uncertainty to Equitable, Transparent, Performance-based

Equitable, transparent, performance-based grading, advancement, and crediting policies enable students to progress to higher-level work and meet important milestones based on demonstrated readiness.

• System Indicators: A clear purpose, with strong ties to the culture of mastery, drives equitable and transparent grading, advancement, and crediting policies and practices, which are agency-promoting, grounded in research, and built on a common understanding of the competencies.
• Student Learning Indicators: Students and adults collaborate to build a shared understanding of the competencies, which they use to equitably identify goals, communicate growing competence, determine advancement, and certify achievement.

Shifting from Prioritizing Reporting to Prioritizing and Tracking Growth

Systems to track growth and manage data support student agency and make student progress and achievement clear to all stakeholders.

• System Indicators: Competency-based data management systems enable students, teachers, and families to collaboratively monitor learner progress against individualized goals.
• Student Learning Indicators: Students and adults collaboratively and continuously gather, document, and analyze, in real time, an array of student data to respond to learner needs, supporting their growth.

The statute section 33-1632, 2019, and the Idaho Mastery-based Education Framework, established in 2020.

Both a traditional education system and Idaho Mastery Education work to ensure all students are proficient in Idaho Content Standards. In partnership with the content standards, the Idaho College and Career Readiness Competencies play a strong and essential role in student performance.

In traditional models of education, all students are promoted at the same time, whether or not each student fully mastered the content, which can result in gaps in students’ learning. With mastery, students are met where they are. Examples of mastery are all around us from riding a bike to arts and athletics, so it’s a familiar and common idea to most people outside of the classroom.

Mastery education seeks to move from earning points, grades, and credits to accomplishing learning goals. In the traditional system, a low grade can be seen as failure and is terminal. In a competency-based system, it’s just the beginning of the journey to mastery.

Grades may “look” a little different as mastery moves away from distilling collective learning experiences into simple letter grades and moves closer to growth minded perspectives with precise assessment and feedback. The guiding principles of mastery-based grading and advancement include:

• Transparency: Students understand the assessment criteria, know what to expect and have access to their data. It is clear how behavior and academic factors relate to grading and reporting practices and policies
• Learning and Growth: Students are not penalized for early mistakes. They have the opportunity to use feedback to improve their learning. Growth is valued and recognized as the vehicle for reaching high levels of performance
• Agency: Students are active participants in understanding and engaging in the assess of their own learning. They are given opportunities to self-monitor and make decision to support their learning
• Consistency: There is constitution-wide consistency in how and when feedback is provided, how grades or performance/growth metrics are calculated, and when and how data is shared
• Fairness: One size does not fit all. Individual strengths, needs, and circumstances are considered to ensure students have a fair shot at success. Criteria for success are stable
• Validity: The tools and practices used to measure and report on growth and performance, and to calculate grades are sound, reasonable, and considered credible to stake holders

Will school and grading look the same as it always has? Probably not! However, research shows that mastery principles are practiced through all educational systems. Additionally, mastery has long been a part of all our communities, from learning to ride a bike, to arts and athletics, so it should be familiar to most students and parents. Parents will be empowered by a transparent system that clearly shows how your child is doing. Like always, consider yourself the strongest stakeholder in your child’s education, share your voice and take opportunities to shape your child’s learning. Idaho Mastery Education is system that will help teachers better meet the needs of your child.

Students will notice a lot more transparency in the assessment and performance process, a big step up in personal accountability and learning ownership, in addition to greater agency and communication. In other words, the STUDENT becomes the center of the learning process and system…not the teacher, the school or the system!

Students can also earn credit for outside of classroom learning (House Bill 172) and demonstrating mastery (IDAPA Code 08.02.03 105.01.b) of a subject or content.

• Learners participate in a range of different learning techniques (teacher-facilitated, small group, individual, conferencing) and flexible groupings with other students based on their specific goals or needs.
• Learners are regularly engaged in crafting, leading, and sharing the results of their inquiry, and can articulate their experiences: how they make connections and build background knowledge, how they engage in deep investigation, the process of synthesizing information and reflecting; and finally, the creation of work products or performances to demonstrate mastery.
• Learners have ongoing opportunities to build strong relationships with adults, including parents and educators, who will continue to be formally engaged in their learning.
• Learners access their learning data in real time, and can take a leading role in discussing, reflecting, and evaluating their work status relative to their goals.

• American Heritage Charter School
• Beutler Middle School
• Bonneville Online Elementary School
• Bridgewater Elementary School
• Cassia High School
• Central Academy
• Challis Elementary School
• Challis Junior Senior High School
• Columbia High School
• Discovery Elementary
• Eagle Academy
• Falls City Academy
• Hazel Stuart Elementary
• Hillcrest High School
• Idaho Home Learning Academy
• Idaho Virtual Academy
• Idaho STEM Academy (Bingham Academy)
• Kimberly High School
• Meadows Valley School
• Meridian Academy High School
• Middleton Academy
• Mountain View Alternative High School
• Mt Harrison Jr High School
• Mt Harrison High School
• North Valley Academy
• Notus Elementary
• (Praxium) Rocky Mountain Middle School
• Project Impact STEM Academy
• Salmon Jr/Sr High School
• Salmon River JSD
• Silver Creek High School
• Soda Springs High School
• Southeastern Idaho Technical Charter School
• Tigert Middle School
• Ucon Elementary
• Union High School
• White Pine Charter School (Elementary)
• White Pine STEM Academy
• Wilder School District